Papers

Existential rule languages are a family of ontology languages that have been widely used in ontology-mediated query answering (OMQA). However, for most of them, the expressive power of representing domain knowledge for OMQA, known as the program expressive power, is not well-understood yet. In this paper, we establish a number of novel characterizations for the program expressive power of several important existential rule languages, including tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), linear TGDs, as well as disjunctive TGDs. The characterizations employ natural model-theoretic properties, and automata-theoretic properties sometimes, which thus provide powerful tools for identifying the definability of domain knowledge for OMQA in these languages.

poster session 2 @ red 4, poster session 9 @ red 4, oral session 2 @ red 4, poster session 2, poster session 9, oral session 2

In logic-based knowledge representation, query answering has essentially replaced mere satisfiability checking as the inferencing problem of primary interest. For knowledge bases in the basic description logic ALC, the computational complexity of conjunctive query (CQ) answering is well known to be EXPTIME-complete and hence not harder than satisfiability. This does not change when the logic is extended by certain features (such as counting or role hierarchies), whereas adding others (inverses, nominals or transitivity together with role-hierarchies) turns CQ answering exponentially harder. We contribute to this line of results by showing the surprising fact that even extending ALC by just the Self operator – which proved innocuous in many other contexts – increases the complexity of CQ entailment to 2EXPTIME. As common for this type of problem, our proof establishes a reduction from alternating Turing machines running in exponential space, but several novel ideas and encoding tricks are required to make the approach work in that specific, restricted setting.

poster session 2 @ red 4, poster session 9 @ red 4, oral session 2 @ red 4, poster session 2, poster session 9, oral session 2

Strategy synthesis for multi-agent systems has proved to be a hard task, even when limited to two-player games with safety objectives. Generalized strategy synthesis, an extension of generalized planning which aims to produce a single solution for multiple (possibly infinitely many) planning instances, is a promising direction to deal with the state-space explosion problem. In this paper, we formalize the problem of generalized strategy synthesis in the situation calculus. The synthesis task involves second-order theorem proving generally. Thus we consider strategies aiming to maintain invariants; such strategies can be verified with first-order theorem proving. We propose a sound but incomplete approach to synthesize invariant strategies by adapting the framework of counterexample-guided refinement. The key idea for refinement is to generate a strategy using a model checker for a game constructed from the counterexample, and use it to refine the candidate general strategy. We implemented our method and did experiments with a number of game problems. Our system can successfully synthesize solutions for most of the domains within a reasonable amount of time.

poster session 2 @ red 4, poster session 9 @ red 4, oral session 2 @ red 4, poster session 2, poster session 9, oral session 2