Papers

Recent studies in the hate and counter hate domain have provided the grounds for investigating how to detect this pervasive content in social media. These studies mostly work with synthetic replies to hateful content written by annotators on demand rather than replies written by real users. We argue that working with naturally occurring replies to hateful content is key to study the problem. Building on this motivation, we create a corpus of 5,652 hateful tweets and replies. We analyze their fine-grained relationships by indicating whether the reply (a) is hate or counter hate speech, (b) provides a justification, (c) attacks the author of the tweet, and (d) adds additional hate. We also present linguistic insights into the language people use depending on these fine-grained relationships. Experimental results show improvements (a) taking into account the hateful tweet in addition to the reply and (b) pretraining with related tasks.

poster session 1 @ red 4, poster session 8 @ red 4, oral session 8 @ red 4, poster session 1, poster session 8, oral session 8

Knowledge graphs (KGs) contain rich information about world knowledge, entities, and relations. Thus, they can be great supplements to existing pre-trained language models. However, it remains a challenge to efficiently integrate information from KG into language modeling. And the understanding of a knowledge graph requires related context. We propose a novel joint pre-training framework, JAKET, to model both the knowledge graph and language. The knowledge module and language module provide essential information to mutually assist each other: the knowledge module produces embeddings for entities in text while the language module generates context-aware initial embeddings for entities and relations in the graph. Our design enables the pre-trained model to easily adapt to unseen knowledge graphs in new domains. Experiment results on several knowledge-aware NLP tasks show that our proposed framework achieves superior performance by effectively leveraging knowledge in language understanding.

poster session 1 @ red 4, poster session 8 @ red 4, oral session 8 @ red 4, poster session 1, poster session 8, oral session 8

We consider language modelling (LM) as a multi-label structured prediction task by re-framing training from solely predicting a single ground-truth word to ranking a set of words which could continue a given context. To avoid annotating top-k ranks, we generate them using pre-trained LMs: GPT-2, BERT, and Born-Again models. This leads to a rank-based form of knowledge distillation (KD). We also develop a method using $N$-grams to create a non-probabilistic teacher which generates the ranks without the need of a pre-trained LM. We confirm the hypotheses: that we can treat LMing as a ranking task and that we can do so without the use of a pre-trained LM. We show that rank-based KD generally gives a modest improvement to perplexity (PPL) -- though often with statistical significance -- when compared to Kullback–Leibler-based KD. Surprisingly, given the naivety of the method, the $N$-grams act as competitive teachers and achieve similar performance as using either BERT or a Born-Again model teachers. Unsurprisingly, GPT-2 always acts as the best teacher. Using it and a Transformer-XL student on Wiki-02, rank-based KD reduces a cross-entropy baseline from 65.27 to 55.94 and against a KL-based KD of 56.70.

poster session 1 @ red 4, poster session 8 @ red 4, oral session 8 @ red 4, poster session 1, poster session 8, oral session 8